John Lewis removes ‘Lollita’ child’s party dress from sale after backlash

By Group Reporter
Sunday, 12th December 2021, 12:11 pm
Updated Sunday, 12th December 2021, 12:13 pm
John Lewis has removed a child’s party dress named “Lollita” from sale after receiving criticism for stocking it (Shutterstock)
John Lewis has removed a child’s party dress named “Lollita” from sale after receiving criticism for stocking it (Shutterstock)

John Lewis has removed a child’s party dress named “Lollita” from sale after receiving criticism for stocking it.

The Chi Chi London Lollita Party Dress was on sale for children aged three to 11 years old on the retailer’s website for £50.

The name is similar to 1955 novel Lolita, written by Vladimir Nabokov, which outlines how a middle-aged professor abused a 12-year-old girl.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

What was said on social media about the ‘Lollita’ dress?

Television presenter Victoria Coren Mitchell tweeted about the dress to her followers.

She said: “If you were going to think of a name for a child’s party dress, what would you NOT call it?”

Replying to her tweet, one person said: “That’s grotesque and vile.”

Another person added: “I would not be able to buy it with that name. Crazy to call it that. The dress is very pretty but I couldn’t.”

One Twitter user stated it was different to the novel due to having two “ls” in the name.

Dress described as ‘a partywear favourite’

The description of the dress, which was previously on John Lewis’ website, said: “This dress is sure to become a partywear favourite.

“Lined with satin for a soft and comfortable finish, this pretty dress features delicate metallic embroidery, scalloped edges and a chiffon skirt with tulle underlay that’s perfect for twirling on the dance floor.”

Chi Chi London is a fashion brand which stocks its clothes with the department store.

The dress does not appear on the company’s website either.

A spokeswoman from John Lewis said: “We removed this product from sale as soon as it was brought to our attention and we apologise for the upset caused.”

A version of this article originally appeared on NationalWorld.com