Bamburgh Castle works approved despite concerns about light pollution

Permission has been granted for lighting installed at Bamburgh Castle six years ago despite concerns about impact on the area’s renowned dark skies.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

An application by Savills, on behalf of Bamburgh Castle Viewings Ltd, sought listed building consent for works carried out in 2014.

Northumberland Coast Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) Partnership had expressed concern about light pollution.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In particular, concern was expressed about a fixing high above the West Ward.

Bamburgh Castle.Bamburgh Castle.
Bamburgh Castle.

Jessica Turner, AONB officer, said: “The justification is ‘providing illumination over the museum in response to overnight lead theft from the museum roof’.

"Whilst the Partnership acknowledges there is a balance between adequate security and lighting of a historic landmark, this fixing is at a considerable height from the much lower museum roof and illuminates an expanse of external wall high above the West Ward - as a result the primary purpose does not appear to be security or safety of movement within in the grounds at night.”

Savills explained that installation of the replacement LED lights was necessary to replace old, failing and inefficient fittings (500w sodium).

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Its planning report states: ‘The replacement fittings present many improvements to the previous installation, both in the quality of the light omitted, method of fixing and visual impact of the light fittings, which are significantly smaller, simpler and more discrete.’

‘The overall effect of the lights to the keep is considered to provide an enhancement of the asset creating a dramatic night time effect consistent with the dramatic nature and setting of the castle.’

The council’s building conservation officer acknowledged the light fittings were ‘a small but detracting feature’ but accepted they could be justified to deter crime.

Planning officer James Hudson concluded: “The harm which may be caused is outweighed by the public benefit of crime prevention and the illumination of a very important heritage asset.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“While the proposals do have the potential to impact on the dark skies, suitably worded conditions restricting the use of the non-essential lighting to between the hours of dawn to dusk and strict positioning of the high lights to ensure that the light spill is not excessive, would limit the negative impact.”

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

The dramatic events of 2020 are having a major impact on many of our local valued advertisers and consequently the advertising that we receive. We are now more reliant than ever on you helping us to provide you with news by buying a copy of our newspaper.

If you can, please do pick up a copy when you are at the shops. Thank you for your support.

Related topics: