Northumberland mental health patients subjected to 'traumatising' restraints

Restraints have been called 'traumatising'.Restraints have been called 'traumatising'.
Restraints have been called 'traumatising'.
Dangerous face-down restraints were used more than 1,000 times on patients in Northumberland last year.

Government reforms aiming to protect mental health patients from unsafe restraint recently came into force following the death of 23-year-old Olaseni Lewis after he was held down by police officers in London.

Mental health charity Mind welcomed the new reforms, known as "Seni’s Law", and said the figures showed how pervasive the use of force is across England.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

According to NHS Digital, restrictive interventions were used roughly 9,805 times on around 185 Northumberland patients with learning disabilities, autism or in secondary mental health services in 2020-21.

Of these, on 1,120 occasions patients were put in the prone position, where they are physically pinned face-down against the floor or another surface – a practice which is said to carry a serious risk of death.

Across England, 151,554 restrictive interventions were used last year – more than two-thirds of which were forms of physical restraint.

This was a 15% rise from the 131,338 interventions the year before, and almost double the 80,387 recorded in 2016-17 – the first year of figures available.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Of those last year, 12,420 were prone restraints – also the highest number on record.

Restrictive interventions include forms of physical, mechanical and chemical restraint, as well as seclusion and segregation.

New guidance was introduced in early December in memory of Mr Lewis, who died in September 2010 days after he fell unconscious while being restrained by 11 police officers at a London hospital.

The Mental Health Units (Use of Force) Act 2018 aims to ensure the use of force against patients in mental health units is better governed and requires police to wear body cameras while carrying out restraint, unless there are legitimate operational reasons for not doing so.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Alison Cobb, senior policy advisor at Mind, said: "The huge number of restrictive interventions shows how pervasive the use of force is as a part of mental health culture.

"It represents daily traumatisation of people in hospital for mental health care and underlines how crucial implementation of Seni’s Law is."

Though the guidance is a "good basis", she said fully funded reform of the Mental Health Act and improved staffing levels are needed to make wards safer.

The figures show black people across England were almost five times as likely to face restrictive interventions as white people.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In 2020-21, the equivalent of 95 black patients per 100,000 were subject to the measures, compared to just 21 per 100,000 white people.

Rethink Mental Illness also welcomed the Seni's Law reforms but said it is "highly concerning" to see the rise in restraints.

Alexa Knight, associate director for policy and practice at the charity, added: "While mental health services have been under pressure due to the pandemic, it is unacceptable that there has been no progress to address the stark inequalities in the racialised use of restraint."

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said Seni’s Law will reduce the use of inappropriate force in mental health settings.

He added: “We are clear restrictive interventions or restraint should only ever be used proportionately and as a last resort."

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.