Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Lumley Castle Hotel
Sponsored by
Chester-le-Street, www.lumleycastle.com

NFU backed in biofuel dispute

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 February 2008
FIONA Hall, Lib Dem Euro MP for the North East, has backed the NFU in a dispute over the future of biofuel production.
The House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee called for a moratorium on the Government's biofuel targets saying that biofuels offered an expensive and ineffective way of cutting greenhouse gas emissions, and policies favouring biofuels risked t
he further destruction of global rainforests.

The NFU reacted angrily to the proposal pointing out that biofuel is the only realistic current alternative to burning fossil fuels in vehicles and to cutting the 25 per cent of UK carbon emissions for which transport is responsible.

Fiona, Lib Dem energy spokesman in the European Parliament, urged the Government to look again at the advantages offered by biofuel production.

"This latest Government U-turn is astonishing and has also raised concern at EU level. Of course we have to be extremely careful to make sure we set tight sustainability criteria for imported biofuels, in order to protect the rainforest. But what about British biofuels? Much of the North East of England is prime land for growing biofuels such as rape seed and wheat; a fact that many local farmers have rightly exploited. And the achievements of our local farmers have been despite the efforts of the Government which has already scrapped all subsidies to the biofuels sector.

"How are landowners meant to plan for the future with such confused and frankly unintelligible signals coming from Westminster?"




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 February 2008 12:01 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Alnwick, Northumberland
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.